Pornstar Ranked

Adult Performers with Documented Criminal Convictions

Most pages published under this search term get the single most important thing wrong: they list people who were charged and never convicted, people who were acquitted, and in a few cases people who were never charged with anything at all.

This page keeps those categories apart, because the difference between them is the whole subject. Ten performers below have convictions we can trace to a court record, a prosecutor’s office or contemporaneous reporting in an established outlet.

Everyone else who commonly appears on lists like this — Ron Jeremy, John Holmes, John Stagliano, Stormy Daniels, Nacho Vidal — is in a separate section that states their actual status in its first line.

The short answer

Ten adult performers have criminal convictions documented here in court records or prosecutors’ press releases. The page opens with Harry Reems, whose 1976 federal obscenity conviction for Deep Throat was overturned on appeal in 1977. The heaviest sentence belongs to Ruben Andre Garcia: twenty years, imposed in June 2021 for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking.

All 10, ranked

Sort by any column. Full profiles follow below; the scoring rubric that produced this order is at the foot of the page.

10 performers
# Performer Index Active Wins HoF Strongest pillar Data
1
Harry Reems
Deep Throat co-star and First Amendment test case
97.2 1970 1 2× Longevity & Consistency high
2
Mr. Marcus
One of the industry’s highest-volume careers, ended by a falsified test result
90.3 1994 0 — Body of Work medium
3
Kendra Sunderland
Entered through a webcam site at 18 and a viral scandal at 19
87.9 2015 6 — Industry Recognition medium
4
Max Hardcore
Performer-producer convicted at trial on ten federal obscenity counts
83.5 1992 0 — Longevity & Consistency medium
5
Austin Wolf
Studio performer sentenced to nineteen years for child sexual exploitation
83.0 2012 0 — Body of Work medium
6
LB Lizzy Borden
Extreme Associates performer and director, imprisoned for distributing obscenity
80.2 1999 0 — Influence & Crossover medium
7
John Wayne Bobbitt
Two adult features made on the back of notoriety; two 1994 battery convictions
76.2 1994 0 — Influence & Crossover low
8
RA Ruben Andre Garcia
GirlsDoPorn performer and lead recruiter, sentenced to twenty years
75.8 2013 0 — Industry Recognition medium
9
JW Jarec Wentworth
Convicted of extorting a technology executive he had met through the industry
74.5 2013 0 — Industry Recognition medium
10
DW Douglas Wiederhold
GirlsDoPorn’s original male performer, and the last defendant sentenced
69.8 2011 0 — Industry Recognition medium
2
Hall of Fame inductions across the list
7
Verified competitive award wins
247
Combined years active
118
Names on the longlist before cuts
81.8
Average index score of the top 20

Wins count verified competitive awards only; nominations are shown on each profile but excluded from this column. “Data” is our confidence in the underlying record — see each profile for exactly which fields are unconfirmed.

The ranking

Ten documented cases

Read this in date order, not in the order it is printed. The number beside each name is the Pornstar Ranked Performer Index — the same measure of a professional adult-industry record used on every other page in this programme — and it is not a measure of the offence, the sentence or the harm done. A misdemeanour and a twenty-year federal sentence sit on this page together, and the index says nothing about the difference. The order we would actually read these cases in is chronological, and it is set out under “Cases in date order” below. Every entry states what the person was convicted of, by which court, when, and what happened to the sentence.

1
Harry Reems — photograph 1 of 3
HRAVN Hall of Fame 1985
HR
U.S. Marshal Service, Memphis, Tennessee, United States · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

1. Harry Reems

Deep Throat co-star and First Amendment test case
97.2
Index
2× Hall of Fame deceased high confidence 1 verified win
Born
1947New York City, New York
Age
—
Active
1970–1970–1985; died 2013
Credits
~14025 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Harry ranks 1st

Reems is the reason this page opens where it does, and the single most important thing to say about him is that his conviction did not stand.

Indicted in Memphis in 1975 on a federal charge of conspiring to distribute obscene material across state lines, he was convicted by a jury in March 1976 — his lawyers argued at the time that he was the first American actor prosecuted federally purely for appearing in a film.

An appeals court overturned the conviction in April 1977 on the ground that the conduct predated the Supreme Court’s 1973 obscenity test in Miller v. California, and ordered a new trial. The charges were dropped in August 1977. He was never retried and never punished. Mainstream legal figures, Alan Dershowitz among them, backed the appeal.

The case against: The conviction was overturned and the charges dropped: Reems has no criminal record arising from this case and should not be described as a convicted person. He died in 2013. He is on this page because the prosecution is the origin of every argument that followed it, not because there is a conviction to report.
Ranked alongside

Ranked alongside

Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
9.9
Body of Work 30%
9.5
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
9.7
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
9.7
Longevity & Consistency 25%
10.0
Influence & Crossover 15%
9.5
Editorial override. Influence set editorially. A federal obscenity prosecution for on-screen appearance, overturned on appeal, changed the legal position of every performer who came after him. Counting his mainstream credits and business ventures — the inputs our Influence pillar reads — captures none of that.
Career and credits

Career

Herbert Streicher rose to notoriety with Deep Throat, one of the highest-grossing adult films of its era, followed by The Devil in Miss Jones. In 1974 he became the first American performer federally prosecuted for obscenity solely for appearing on screen; his 1976 conviction was overturned on appeal and charges dropped in 1977, drawing support from mainstream legal figures including Alan Dershowitz. He left the industry in the mid-1980s and later worked as a licensed real-estate agent in Utah.

Signature: The only performer here whose lasting significance is a constitutional case — he was prosecuted for acting, and the reversal mattered well beyond this industry.

Best known for

Deep Throat (1972)The Devil in Miss Jones (1973)
Award record
  • 1985AVN — Hall of Fame
  • 1985XRCO — Hall of Fame
Show full award record (1 more) Show fewer
  • 1986AVN — Best Actor (Trashy Lady)

Beyond performing

  • Real estate, post-retirement

Mainstream credits

  • National Lampoon’s Movie Madness (1982)
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • height not documented
  • AVN Hall of Fame year of 1985 recorded here per his own Wikipedia biography, but the AVN Hall of Fame’s own Wikipedia membership list gives no year for him (he is listed as a member without a date); year not independently confirmed against the ceremony itself
2
Mr. Marcus — photograph 1 of 3
Mr. Marcus — photograph 2 of 3
Mr. Marcus — photograph 3 of 3
Alan from Chicago, USA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

2. Mr. Marcus

One of the industry’s highest-volume careers, ended by a falsified test result
90.3
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
1970Pomona, California
Age
56
Active
1994–1994–2013
Credits
~1800
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Mr. ranks 2nd

This is the only case here that arose from the industry’s own workplace safety system. Mr. Marcus tested positive for syphilis in July 2012, was treated, and then altered a copy of the test document — folding the page so the positive result did not show — and kept working. Two female co-stars were exposed.

The Los Angeles City Attorney prosecuted, he pleaded no contest in Los Angeles Superior Court to knowingly exposing another person to a communicable disease, and on 4 June 2013 he was sentenced to 30 days in jail, 36 months of probation and 15 days of community labour.

He carried by some distance the longest and highest-volume career of anyone on this page: nineteen documented years and a reported total above 1,800 titles acted in or directed.

The case against: The offence was a misdemeanour and the sentence was thirty days, which is at the opposite end of this page from the trafficking cases; the size of his index figure reflects the length of his career, not the seriousness of the conviction. A no-contest plea is a conviction but not an admission. Whether he has worked at all since 2013 is undocumented, and no award on his record was verifiable.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
9.9
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
8.9
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
8.2
Longevity & Consistency 25%
9.4
Influence & Crossover 15%
8.5
Career and credits

Career

Mr. Marcus worked from 1994 and built one of the largest credit counts of any performer of his generation, directing as well as performing. In July 2012 he tested positive for syphilis, received treatment, and then altered a copy of the test document by folding the page so that the positive result did not appear, and continued working. Two female co-stars were exposed. The Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office prosecuted him and he pleaded no contest in Los Angeles Superior Court to knowingly exposing another person to a communicable disease. On 4 June 2013 he was sentenced to 30 days in jail, 36 months of probation and 15 days of community labour. A separate civil judgment followed. His performing career effectively ended with the case.

Signature: A rare case of the American industry’s own health-testing system producing a criminal prosecution rather than an internal sanction.

Beyond performing

  • Directing credits
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Credit total is a published figure rather than a database count
  • Award record not cross-checked against any ceremony archive and therefore not recorded
  • Whether he has worked at all since 2013 is not documented
3
Kendra Sunderland — photograph 1 of 3
Kendra Sunderland — photograph 2 of 3
Kendra Sunderland — photograph 3 of 3
Baldwin Saintilus from USA · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

3. Kendra Sunderland

Entered through a webcam site at 18 and a viral scandal at 19
87.9
Index
active medium confidence 6 verified wins
Born
1995United States
Age
31
Active
2015–Webcam work from 2014; film career 2015–present
Credits
—
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
Blondenot documented
Why Kendra ranks 3rd

The smallest case on this page, and the one that shows most clearly why a page like this needs a sense of proportion. In January 2015 Sunderland filmed a webcam broadcast inside the Oregon State University library.

She was charged with public indecency, pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanour count in Benton County Circuit Court in September 2015, and was fined $1,000. She had already dropped out of the university and been banned from campus.

She then built a documented film career on the notoriety: XBIZ Web Star of the Year in 2016, an AVN scene win in 2017, and further scene wins in 2024 and 2025 — the record that also places her on the Pornhub pornstars ranking we publish. Hers is the only case here where the conviction and the career are causally connected in that direction.

The case against: A $1,000 fine for a misdemeanour is not, on any sensible reading, the same category of event as a twenty-year federal sentence, and the fact that both appear on one page is a limitation of the page rather than a judgement about the people on it. The matter closed in 2015 and there is nothing outstanding.
Ranked alongside

Ranked alongside

Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
9.5
Body of Work 30%
8.7
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
9.1
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
9.0
Longevity & Consistency 25%
8.5
Influence & Crossover 15%
8.5
Career and credits

Career

Sunderland started posting to the webcam site MyFreeCams in 2014, at eighteen. In early 2015 a video she recorded inside the Oregon State University library went viral; she was charged with public indecency, pleaded guilty, paid a $1,000 fine, and was expelled from the university and banned from campus. She turned the notoriety into a film career, taking XBIZ Web Star of the Year in 2016 and an AVN scene award in 2017, signed with Brazzers in 2020 and then with Vixen Media Group until 2023, and now works independently.

Signature: The purest example of the platform route into this category: no agency, no studio, an audience built on a webcam site before anyone in the industry had heard of her.

Studios

BrazzersVixen Media Group
Award record
  • 2016XBIZ — Web Star of the Year
  • 2017AVN — Best Boy/Girl Sex Scene
Show full award record (4 more) Show fewer
  • 2024XBIZ — Best Sex Scene — Gonzo
  • 2025XMA — Best Sex Scene — Vignette
  • 2018Pornhub — Nicest Tits (Fan Award)
  • 2015NightMoves — Miss Congeniality

Beyond performing

  • Independent subscription and clip work since 2023
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Birthplace
  • Credit count
  • Exact first film credit
4
Max Hardcore — photograph 1 of 3
MHDebut 1992
MH
jerone2 · CC BY-SA 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

4. Max Hardcore

Performer-producer convicted at trial on ten federal obscenity counts
83.5
Index
deceased medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
1956Racine, Wisconsin
Age
—
Active
1992–1992–2011
Credits
—1 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Max ranks 4th

This is the clearest federal obscenity conviction against a working performer in the modern era, and it is documented end to end in the Justice Department’s own record. Little was indicted in the Middle District of Florida in May 2007 over films mailed to a Tampa address and trailers served from his website.

A jury convicted him on all ten counts in June 2008. Judge Susan Bucklew imposed 46 months, three years of supervised release and a $7,500 fine on 3 October 2008, with forfeiture of the films, the profits and the domain names; his company was fined $75,000.

The Justice Department’s release describes him as a director, producer and star of the material, which is why this case belongs on a page about performers rather than on one about distributors.

The case against: The sentence is finished. He entered custody in January 2009, served roughly two and a half years including a period of home confinement, was released in 2011 and died in March 2023. Nothing about this case is ongoing. His award record is widely reported and could not be verified against any ceremony archive, so none is recorded on his profile.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
7.8
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.8
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
8.2
Longevity & Consistency 25%
9.4
Influence & Crossover 15%
8.5
Career and credits

Career

Paul F. Little worked as Max Hardcore from the early 1990s, producing, directing and appearing in his own releases through Max World Entertainment. In May 2007 he and the company were indicted in the Middle District of Florida on five counts of transporting obscene matter by interactive computer service and five counts of mailing obscene matter. A federal jury convicted him on all ten counts in June 2008. On 3 October 2008 US District Judge Susan Bucklew sentenced him to 46 months in prison, three years of supervised release and a $7,500 fine, and ordered forfeiture of the films, the profits and the domain names; Max World Entertainment was fined $75,000 and placed on five years of probation. He began the sentence in January 2009 and was released in 2011, having served roughly two and a half years. He died in Los Angeles in March 2023.

Signature: Convicted at trial rather than by plea, in a period when comparable federal obscenity cases mostly ended in a plea, a hung jury or a dismissal.

Studios

Max World Entertainment

Beyond performing

  • Founder, Max World Entertainment
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • No reliable published credit total
  • Award record not cross-checked against any ceremony archive and therefore not recorded
5
Austin Wolf — photograph 1 of 3
Austin Wolf — photograph 2 of 3
Austin Wolf — photograph 3 of 3
Jeff Kern from Orlando · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

5. Austin Wolf

Studio performer sentenced to nineteen years for child sexual exploitation
83.0
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
1981Alvarado, Texas
Age
45
Active
2012–2012–2024
Credits
—4 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Austin ranks 5th

Smith performed as Austin Wolf from 2012 and moved through four of the largest gay studios — Randy Blue, Falcon, CockyBoys and Men.com — which makes this the case on the page with the strongest mainstream studio career attached to it. The FBI searched his Manhattan apartment in April 2024 and arrested him that June.

He pleaded guilty in the Southern District of New York to enticing a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity and to engaging in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer sentenced him on 29 September 2025 to 19 years in prison, ten years of supervised release and a $40,000 fine. Prosecutors stated he possessed about 1,291 files of child sexual abuse material and had distributed such material to at least fifteen people.

The case against: None of the conduct involved his work, his colleagues or any set: the offences are unconnected to the adult industry and the industry is not the subject of the case. His fan-voted award record is reported in trade coverage and was not verified against any ceremony archive, so nothing is recorded on his profile.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
9.1
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
8.5
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
7.3
Longevity & Consistency 25%
8.9
Influence & Crossover 15%
6.8
Career and credits

Career

Justin Heath Smith performed as Austin Wolf from 2012, moving through Randy Blue, Falcon Studios, CockyBoys and Men.com. The FBI searched his Manhattan apartment in April 2024 and arrested him that June. He pleaded guilty in the Southern District of New York to enticing a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity and to engaging in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct. On 29 September 2025 US District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer sentenced him to 19 years in prison, ten years of supervised release and a $40,000 fine. The Justice Department stated that he was found in possession of approximately 1,291 files of child sexual abuse material and had shared such material with at least fifteen other people.

Signature: A working performer at the peak of a mainstream-studio career, convicted of conduct that had nothing to do with the industry he worked in.

Studios

Randy BlueFalcon StudiosCockyBoysMen.com
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • No reliable published credit total
  • A fan-voted award record is widely reported and was not verified against any ceremony archive, so none is recorded here
6
LBDebut 1999
LB
LB
Illustrated placeholder — no licensed photograph on file

6. Lizzy Borden

Extreme Associates performer and director, imprisoned for distributing obscenity
80.2
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—Huntington Beach, California
Age
—
Active
1999–1999–2009
Credits
—1 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Lizzy ranks 6th

United States v. Extreme Associates ran for six years and is the case that persuaded most of the American industry that federal obscenity prosecution was a live risk again. Romano performed in and directed the material at issue and was a full partner in the company alongside her then-husband.

The 2003 indictment in the Western District of Pennsylvania was dismissed at first instance on privacy grounds and reinstated by the Third Circuit, after which both defendants pleaded guilty in March 2009 to a single count of conspiracy to distribute obscene material.

On 1 July 2009 each received one year and one day in prison and two years of supervised release. CBS News reported her telling the court she had not known that making pornography would destroy her life.

The case against: The sentence is complete: she surrendered in September 2009 and was released in May 2010. Her date of birth is not documented anywhere reliable and no credit total has ever been published, so two of the six pillars rest on imputed values rather than measurements. She has not worked in the industry since.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
7.8
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.8
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
8.2
Longevity & Consistency 25%
8.1
Influence & Crossover 15%
8.5
Career and credits

Career

Janet Romano performed and directed for Extreme Associates, the company she ran with her then-husband Rob Zicari. The pair and the company were indicted in the Western District of Pennsylvania in 2003 over films sold by mail and online, and the case ran for six years, including a dismissal that the Third Circuit reversed. Both pleaded guilty in March 2009 to one count of conspiracy to distribute obscene material. On 1 July 2009 each was sentenced to one year and one day in prison plus two years of supervised release; CBS News reported her telling the court at sentencing that she had not known making pornography would destroy her life. She began the sentence in September 2009 and was released in May 2010.

Signature: One of very few performers ever imprisoned in the United States over the content of a film rather than over anything that happened on a set.

Studios

Extreme Associates

Beyond performing

  • Director, Extreme Associates
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date of birth not documented
  • No reliable published credit total
7
John Wayne Bobbitt — photograph 1 of 3
JWDebut 1994
JW
Bob K (D.B) · CC BY 2.5 · via Wikimedia Commons

7. John Wayne Bobbitt

Two adult features made on the back of notoriety; two 1994 battery convictions
76.2
Index
retired low confidence 0 verified wins
Born
1967not documented
Age
59
Active
1994–1994–1996
Credits
~2
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why John ranks 7th

Bobbitt is on this page because he is a documented adult-film performer with documented convictions, and because both halves of that sentence need saying carefully.

His adult work amounts to two features made to monetise the notoriety of 1993 — John Wayne Bobbitt Uncut in 1994 and Frankenpenis in 1996 — alongside talk-show and professional-wrestling appearances.

His convictions have nothing to do with any of it: in Las Vegas in 1994 he was convicted twice within weeks of misdemeanour domestic battery against his then-fiancée. He served most of a fifteen-day sentence for the first.

TIME reported the second, in Las Vegas Municipal Court that September, where the judge described him from the bench as a bully. Both criminal trials arising from the 1993 incident itself ended in acquittals.

The case against: His professional record in this industry is two films, which is why every computed pillar on his profile sits at the bottom of the field. Later convictions appear on his Wikipedia article without a cited primary source and are not asserted here. His exact date and place of birth are undocumented, which is why this record is marked low confidence.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
6.4
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.1
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
8.9
Longevity & Consistency 25%
7.2
Influence & Crossover 15%
9.9
Career and credits

Career

Bobbitt became internationally known in 1993, and the two criminal trials that followed the incident ended in acquittals for both him and his then-wife. He then made two adult features, John Wayne Bobbitt Uncut in 1994 and Frankenpenis in 1996, alongside a run of talk-show and professional-wrestling appearances. His convictions are unconnected to that work: in Las Vegas in 1994 he was convicted twice within weeks of misdemeanour domestic battery against his then-fiancée. He served most of a fifteen-day sentence for the first; TIME reported the second conviction in Las Vegas Municipal Court that September, where the judge described him from the bench as a bully.

Signature: The clearest illustration on this page of a conviction that has nothing to do with the adult industry, attached to someone whose adult-film work was itself incidental.

Best known for

John Wayne Bobbitt Uncut (1994)Frankenpenis (1996)

Mainstream credits

  • Howard Stern New Year’s Eve special (1993)
  • WWE Monday Night Raw (1998)
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Exact date and place of birth not documented
  • Sentence imposed for the second 1994 conviction not documented
  • Later convictions appear on his Wikipedia article without a cited primary source and are not asserted here
8
RADebut 2013
RA
RA
Illustrated placeholder — no licensed photograph on file

8. Ruben Andre Garcia

GirlsDoPorn performer and lead recruiter, sentenced to twenty years
75.8
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—not documented
Age
—
Active
2013–2013–2017
Credits
—1 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Ruben ranks 8th

This is the heaviest sentence on the page and the one where the crime and the performing were the same act.

The Justice Department describes Garcia as an adult film performer and producer who worked as a recruiter, producer and actor for GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys between about 2013 and 2017, and he admitted in his December 2020 guilty plea that he and the site’s owner were the operation’s two lead recruiters.

The scheme used fake modelling advertisements, front companies with innocuous names, paid references who reassured women who hesitated, and threats of lawsuits, cancelled flights and publication once filming had begun.

He was sentenced to 20 years for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion, and ordered with his co-defendants to pay roughly $18 million in restitution.

The case against: Nothing outside this operation is documented about his career — no studios, no credit count, no birth date. The two Justice Department releases covering the case give different sentencing dates within June 2021, so only the month is asserted. Six other defendants were convicted in the same conspiracy and only one of them was a performer.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
7.8
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.8
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
7.3
Longevity & Consistency 25%
7.7
Influence & Crossover 15%
6.8
Career and credits

Career

The Justice Department describes Garcia as an adult film performer and producer who worked as a recruiter, producer and actor for the GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys websites from about 2013 to 2017. He pleaded guilty in December 2020 to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion, admitting that he and the site’s owner Michael Pratt were the operation’s two lead recruiters; that they placed fake modelling advertisements and used front companies; that women who hesitated were reassured by paid references; and that participants were threatened with lawsuits, cancelled flights and publication if they tried to stop. He was sentenced in June 2021 to 20 years in prison in the Southern District of California and ordered, with his co-defendants, to pay approximately $18 million in restitution.

Signature: The Justice Department treated him as a principal rather than as talent: he appeared in the videos and he brought the women in.

Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date and place of birth not documented; the Justice Department gave his age as 31 in 2021
  • No reliable published credit total
  • The two Justice Department releases give 4 June and 14 June 2021 for the sentencing date; only the month is asserted here
9
JWDebut 2013
JW
JW
Illustrated placeholder — no licensed photograph on file

9. Jarec Wentworth

Convicted of extorting a technology executive he had met through the industry
74.5
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—not documented
Age
—
Active
2013–2013–2015
Credits
—1 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Jarec ranks 9th

Brank demanded a further $1 million from Donald Burns, chairman of the internet telephony company MagicJack, threatening to tell his social-media following that Burns had been paying him to procure male escorts. Burns had already handed over roughly $500,000 and an Audi R8.

The FBI arrested Brank in a sting in March 2015 and recovered a loaded revolver from his vehicle. A federal jury in Los Angeles convicted him in July 2015 on six extortion-related counts and he was sentenced on 27 October 2015 to 70 months in prison plus about $500,000 in restitution; the Ninth Circuit later affirmed both conviction and sentencing calculation.

What was for sale here was the threat of exposure as a customer, which makes it the one case on the page where the industry is the subject of the offence rather than its backdrop.

The case against: His adult-film career is barely documented — no verified studio affiliation, no credit count, no date of birth beyond a reported age of 26 at sentencing. A 70-month term imposed in 2015 would ordinarily have been completed years ago; we have no source for his current status and make no claim about it.
Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
7.8
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.8
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
7.3
Longevity & Consistency 25%
7.2
Influence & Crossover 15%
6.8
Career and credits

Career

Teofil Brank performed in gay adult films as Jarec Wentworth. In March 2015 the FBI arrested him in a sting operation after he demanded a further $1 million from Donald Burns, chairman of the internet telephony company MagicJack, threatening to tell his social-media followers that Burns had been paying him to procure male escorts; Burns had already given him about $500,000 and an Audi R8. A loaded revolver was recovered from his vehicle. A federal jury in Los Angeles convicted him in July 2015 on six extortion-related counts, and on 27 October 2015 he was sentenced to 70 months in prison and ordered to pay roughly $500,000 in restitution. The Ninth Circuit later affirmed the conviction and the sentencing calculation.

Signature: The one case here in which the industry was the subject of the crime rather than its setting: what was for sale was the threat of exposure as a customer.

Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date and place of birth not documented; his age was reported as 26 in October 2015
  • Studio affiliations reported only in LGBT trade coverage and therefore not recorded
  • No reliable published credit total
10
DWDebut 2011
DW
DW
Illustrated placeholder — no licensed photograph on file

10. Douglas Wiederhold

GirlsDoPorn’s original male performer, and the last defendant sentenced
69.8
Index
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—not documented
Age
—
Active
2011–2011–2012
Credits
~711 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Douglas ranks 10th

Wiederhold was the male performer in the first phase of GirlsDoPorn, from at least January 2011 to March 2012, and prosecutors put the number of videos at 71.

He was a salaried employee rather than an owner: he collected women from the airport, drove them to the shoots, and — on the site owner’s instruction — told them the videos were going to a single foreign collector or to a few viewers in Australia.

He kept giving those assurances after he knew the material was being sold online. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking under the general conspiracy statute and was sentenced on 30 January 2026 to four years by Judge Janis L. Sammartino, with a self-surrender date in March. Six of his victims addressed the court.

The case against: His role was the smallest of the seven charged, which is reflected in the charge he pleaded to and in the four-year sentence. He left the conspiracy in 2012, and the judge said as much from the bench before imposing sentence. There is no documented adult-industry work of any kind outside this one operation, so his professional record here is close to empty.
Ranked alongside

Ranked alongside

Score breakdown
Industry Recognition 15%
7.8
Body of Work 30%
6.8
Show all six pillars (4 more) Show fewer
Audience Demand 5%
7.3
Craft & Screen Presence 10%
7.3
Longevity & Consistency 25%
6.6
Influence & Crossover 15%
6.8
Career and credits

Career

Wiederhold was the male performer in GirlsDoPorn’s videos from at least January 2011 until March 2012, a salaried employee who also collected women from the airport and drove them to shoots. Prosecutors said that at Michael Pratt’s direction he told the women their videos would not be posted online — that they were going to a single collector abroad, or to a handful of viewers in Australia — and that he continued to give those assurances after he knew the videos were being sold on girlsdoporn.com and promoted on free tube sites. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and was sentenced on 30 January 2026 to four years in prison by US District Judge Janis L. Sammartino, with a self-surrender date of 27 March 2026. He was the last of seven charged defendants to be sentenced.

Signature: The case that closed the GirlsDoPorn prosecution, fourteen years after the conduct and on the smallest role in it.

Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date and place of birth not documented; the Justice Department gave his age as 42 in 2026
  • No adult-industry work is documented outside this one operation
Convicted, but not performers

Three convicted industry figures who never performed

These three men are searched for constantly under this keyword and none of them was an adult performer. Michael Pratt owned GirlsDoPorn. Rob Zicari co-founded Extreme Associates. Ira Isaacs produced and sold videos through his own websites. All three have serious, fully documented convictions, and all three are routinely written up as “porn stars” by pages that never checked.

Performer Role Best known for Active
Michael Pratt
Owner of GirlsDoPorn; twenty-seven years for sex trafficking
Adult website operator — 2011
Rob Zicari
Extreme Associates co-founder, imprisoned alongside Lizzy Borden
Adult film producer and director — 1993
II Ira Isaacs
Producer sentenced to four years after a federal obscenity conviction
Adult film producer and distributor — 2004

They are presented rather than ranked because scoring an owner or a producer on an index built to measure performing careers would reproduce exactly the confusion this article exists to correct. There is no rank number and no composite score on these profiles, and there will not be one. Each carries a job title that states what they actually did.

The distinction is not pedantry. In the GirlsDoPorn prosecution seven people were convicted; two of them appeared in the videos and five did not, and their sentences ranged from two years to twenty-seven. Collapsing that into “porn stars convicted” loses the entire structure of the case.

None of the three men below performed in adult films. Describing them as adult performers is factually wrong, and it is the most common error made under this search term.

Michael Pratt — photograph 1 of 3
Michael Pratt — photograph 2 of 3
MPDebut 2011
FBI · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Michael Pratt

Owner of GirlsDoPorn; twenty-seven years for sex trafficking
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—not documented
Age
—
Active
2011–GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys operated until 2019
Credits
—2 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Michael is included

Pratt owned and ran GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys, and he is the name most often typed alongside this search term by people who assume he was a performer. He was not.

He was charged in October 2019, liquidated his assets, fled the United States, spent more than three years on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list and was arrested in Spain in December 2022 before extradition in March 2024.

He pleaded guilty on 5 June 2025 to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion and to sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion.

On 8 September 2025, after forty women testified across five hours, Judge Janis L. Sammartino sentenced him to 27 years and varied upward from the guideline range, telling him she had never handled a case of this magnitude.

The case against: He is not ranked because he was never a performer, and scoring an operator on a performer index would reproduce exactly the confusion this page exists to clear up. Almost nothing about him is documented outside the prosecution: no date of birth, no career before the websites.
Career and credits

Career

Pratt owned and operated the subscription websites GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys, which recruited young women — most of them 18 to 21 — through misleading modelling advertisements and false assurances that the videos would never appear online. He was charged in October 2019 in the Southern District of California, liquidated his assets, fled the United States, was placed on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list, and was arrested in Spain in December 2022 and extradited in March 2024. He pleaded guilty on 5 June 2025 to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion and to committing sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. On 8 September 2025, after five hours of testimony from forty women, US District Judge Janis L. Sammartino sentenced him to 27 years in prison, varying upward from the guideline range.

Signature: He was never a performer. He is here because he is the name most often attached to this search term, and because the distinction between operating a site and appearing in its videos is the whole point of this page.

Beyond performing

  • Owner, GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date and place of birth not documented; the Justice Department gave his age as 42 in 2025
  • Exact start date of the business not documented; the charged conspiracy runs from at least 2011
Rob Zicari — photograph 1 of 3
Rob Zicari — photograph 2 of 3
RZDebut 1993
Luke Ford · CC BY-SA 2.5 · via Wikimedia Commons

Rob Zicari

Extreme Associates co-founder, imprisoned alongside Lizzy Borden
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
1974Rochester, New York
Age
52
Active
1993–1993–2009 as a producer and director
Credits
—2 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Rob is included

Zicari founded Extreme Video in the mid-1990s, co-founded Extreme Associates in 1998 and ran the Xtreme Pro Wrestling promotion alongside it. He and Janet Romano were indicted in 2003 in the Western District of Pennsylvania and, after the Third Circuit reinstated a dismissed case, both pleaded guilty in March 2009 to a single conspiracy count.

Each received one year and one day in prison on 1 July 2009. He served the sentence at a federal facility in Texas. The prosecution is one of the most consequential in the industry’s legal history, and it is routinely written up as a case about a “porn star” — which he is not. Reference sources and contemporaneous reporting describe him as a producer, director and promoter.

The case against: The sentence was completed in 2010. He is presented rather than ranked because he did not perform, and because the entire value of separating him from Lizzy Borden is that the two of them faced identical charges from genuinely different roles.
Career and credits

Career

Zicari founded Extreme Video in the mid-1990s and co-founded Extreme Associates in 1998, and also ran the Xtreme Pro Wrestling promotion. He and his then-wife Janet Romano were indicted in 2003 in the Western District of Pennsylvania for distributing obscene material by mail and online, in a prosecution that became the best-known American obscenity case of its decade. Both pleaded guilty in March 2009 to a single count of conspiracy, and on 1 July 2009 each received one year and one day in prison with two years of supervised release. He served his sentence at a federal facility in Texas.

Signature: Contemporaneous reporting and reference sources describe him as a producer, director and promoter, not as a performer. He is presented here rather than ranked for that reason.

Studios

Extreme Associates

Beyond performing

  • Co-founder, Extreme Associates
  • Founder, Xtreme Pro Wrestling
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • No reliable published output total
IIDebut 2004
II
II
Illustrated placeholder — no licensed photograph on file

Ira Isaacs

Producer sentenced to four years after a federal obscenity conviction
retired medium confidence 0 verified wins
Born
—not documented
Age
—
Active
2004–2004–2012
Credits
—1 studios
Height
—
Hair / Eyes
—not documented
Why Ira is included

Isaacs produced and sold obscene videos through his own websites under the name Stolen Car Films from about 2004. It took the government three attempts: the first trial ended in a mistrial in 2008, the second in a hung jury in 2012, and a third Los Angeles jury convicted him on all counts of a superseding indictment on 27 April 2012.

Judge George H. King sentenced him in January 2013 to 48 months in prison, three years of supervised release and a $10,000 fine.

He is included as a companion case because his case belongs to the same federal obscenity effort that produced the Max Hardcore and Extreme Associates convictions, and because a page about convicted performers should be explicit that he was not one.

The case against: He appears in no films as a performer and is not ranked. Very little biography is documented: no birth date, no career outside the company, and the exact January 2013 sentencing date is not asserted here because the Justice Department release gives only the month.
Career and credits

Career

The Justice Department stated that Isaacs began operating as Stolen Car Films in about 2004, producing obscene videos and advertising and selling them through his own websites. His first federal trial collapsed in 2008 and a second ended in a hung jury in 2012; a third jury in Los Angeles convicted him on all counts of a superseding indictment on 27 April 2012. In January 2013 US District Judge George H. King sentenced him to 48 months in prison, three years of supervised release and a $10,000 fine.

Signature: A producer and distributor rather than a performer, and one of the final cases in the federal obscenity effort that also caught Max Hardcore and Extreme Associates.

Beyond performing

  • Stolen Car Films
Official links
Sources and verification2 sources
Not yet confirmed:
  • Date and place of birth not documented
  • Exact sentencing date in January 2013 not asserted
Definitions

What this page counts, and what it refuses to count

A conviction is a court’s finding of guilt, entered either by a verdict or by a plea the court accepts. Nothing short of that appears in the list above. An arrest is not a conviction. A charge is not a conviction. An indictment is not a conviction. A civil judgment is not a conviction, and neither is a settlement. The distinction is boring and it is also the entire reason this page can be published at all.

Three sources were accepted for a conviction claim: a court record, a press release from a prosecutor, police force or the Department of Justice, and named contemporaneous reporting from an established outlet. That standard is higher than the one we use elsewhere in this programme, and it cost the page real material. A tax conviction attributed to one well-known performer is repeated on hundreds of pages including her own Wikipedia article; we could not find it in a court record or in any contemporaneous report, so it is not here. A Florida obscenity plea exists only on trade forums and a law firm’s own blog, so it is not here either.

The second filter is whether the person is documented as an adult performer at all. Two of the most-cited “porn star” convictions in circulation fail it: the man convicted of murder in Montreal in 2014 is described by the reporting on his own trial as a model and an escort, and the two men convicted over the killing of the producer Bryan Kocis are described by The Advocate as escorts and pornography producers. Calling any of them a performer would be an invented claim about a real person, and inventing that claim is more harmful than omitting the case.

The third filter is status. Where a conviction was overturned, the entry leads with that. Where a sentence has been served and completed, it is written in the past tense and the page says so, because writing about a closed matter as though it were live is its own kind of falsehood. Where a person was acquitted, or the charges were dropped, or the case remains unresolved, they are not in the list at all — they are in the separate section below, and the first sentence of each entry there gives the status.

TermWhat it meansHow it differs
ConvictionA court’s finding of guilt, by verdict or accepted plea. The only thing the main list contains.Not an arrest, not a charge, not an indictment, not a civil judgment, not a settlement.
No contest / nolo contendereA plea that accepts punishment without admitting the facts. It produces a conviction. Mr. Marcus’s 2013 case is one.Distinct from a guilty plea in what it admits, identical in what it produces.
Dismissal and acquittalThe case ends without a conviction — a judge throws it out, or a jury finds the defendant not guilty. John Stagliano in 2010, John Holmes in 1982.Not a conviction under any circumstances, and never presented as one here.
Overturned or vacatedAn appellate court sets a conviction aside. Harry Reems’s 1976 obscenity conviction was overturned in 1977 and the charges were then dropped.The person has no criminal record from the case. Pages that list Reems as “convicted” without the reversal are simply wrong.
Sentence servedThe custodial term is finished. Max Hardcore was released in 2011, Lizzy Borden in May 2010, Rob Zicari in 2010.A completed sentence is not an ongoing situation, and this page does not write about it as one.
Context

What the state has actually prosecuted, 1973–2026

1973–1977

Miller, Memphis, and the one time a performer was prosecuted for acting

The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Miller v. California created the test American obscenity law still uses, and federal prosecutors moved quickly. Harry Reems was indicted in Memphis in 1975 for conspiring to distribute Deep Throat across state lines and convicted in March 1976 — his lawyers said no American actor had previously been prosecuted federally purely for appearing in a film. An appeals court overturned the conviction in April 1977, on the ground that his work predated Miller, and the charges were dropped that August. He was never retried. The case is the origin point of every argument about performer liability that followed, and it ended in a reversal.

1986–1990

The Meese Commission, People v. Freeman, and the retreat

The 1986 Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography recommended aggressive prosecution, and California tried a different route: charging a producer, Harold Freeman, with pandering for paying performers to have sex on camera. Had it stuck, every production in the state would have been a felony. The California Supreme Court reversed the conviction in 1988, holding that the pandering statute was not intended to reach the making of films, and the US Supreme Court declined to review it. That decision is the legal foundation of the entire Los Angeles industry, and it is the reason almost no American performer has faced a state charge arising from performing since.

2005–2013

The Obscenity Prosecution Task Force

The Justice Department created a dedicated obscenity unit in 2005 and it produced the two convictions on this page that are actually about pornography. Max Hardcore was convicted at trial in June 2008 on ten counts and sentenced to 46 months; Extreme Associates, indicted in 2003 and revived by the Third Circuit after a dismissal, ended with Rob Zicari and Lizzy Borden pleading guilty in March 2009 to a year and a day each. Ira Isaacs was convicted at a third attempt in 2012 and sentenced to four years in January 2013. The unit was folded into the department’s child exploitation section in 2011, and adult obscenity prosecutions effectively stopped.

2015–2026

From content to conduct

What replaced obscenity was prosecution of what happens to people rather than what appears on screen. The GirlsDoPorn case, charged in the Southern District of California in 2019, convicted seven defendants of sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion and ran until January 2026; the sentences ranged from two years to twenty-seven, and the two performers among the seven received twenty years and four. Austin Wolf, at the peak of a mainstream studio career, was sentenced to nineteen years in September 2025 for child sexual exploitation with no connection to his work. The state stopped caring what was in the films and started caring how they were made.

Cuts of the same data

Cases in date order

This is the index we would read the page with. The ranked order above is produced by an index of professional records and carries no information about the offences; the groups below carry the structure that actually matters.

1970s

One case, and it was overturned. Convicted March 1976 in Memphis, reversed April 1977, charges dropped that August.

1990s

Two misdemeanour domestic battery convictions in Las Vegas in 1994, unconnected to the two adult features he made in the same period.

2000s

The federal obscenity era: a jury conviction on ten counts in June 2008 and a guilty plea to conspiracy in March 2009. Both sentences were served and completed by 2011.

2010s

Extortion, a falsified health test and a misdemeanour public-indecency fine. Only one of the three has anything to do with the industry.

2020s

Sex trafficking and child sexual exploitation. Twenty years in June 2021, nineteen in September 2025, four in January 2026.

Convictions arising from the work itself

Six of ten. Two obscenity cases about content, one about a falsified test result on set, two about how the videos were obtained, and one that was overturned.

Convictions with no connection to the adult industry

Four of ten. Being an adult performer is incidental to all four cases; they are here because the search term brings people looking for them.

Sentences served and completed

Documented as finished. Nothing about these four matters is ongoing, and the entries are written accordingly.

Editorial process

Not convictions, and cases we could not place

This is the most important section on the page. Everyone named below is routinely listed under this search term as though they had been convicted of something. Some were acquitted. Some had charges dropped. Some were never charged at all. Some were convicted but are not adult performers, and some have convictions we could not source to the standard this page requires. In every case, the status is stated in the first sentence, and no photographs appear in this section.

Convictions we could not place on the list, and why

LM
Luka Magnotta

Convicted of first-degree murder in Montreal in December 2014 and sentenced to life. He is not on the list because no reliable source establishes him as an adult performer: CBC, CBS and ABC Australia all describe him as a model and escort. Asserting an adult-film career on top of a murder conviction would be an invented claim about a real person, and we will not make it.

HC
Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes

Both were convicted over the January 2007 killing of the gay-pornography producer Bryan Kocis — Cuadra of first-degree murder in March 2009, Kerekes by a plea to second-degree murder in December 2008, both sentenced to life without parole. They are not on the list because The Advocate and every reference source we checked describe them as escorts and pornography producers rather than performers. It is one of the most significant criminal cases in the industry’s history and it is not a performer case.

AG
Adam Glasser (Seymore Butts)

Charged in Los Angeles in 2001 with two misdemeanour obscenity counts over a 1999 release. The obscenity charges never produced a conviction: on 20 March 2002, the day the trial would have started, the case was settled by a plea to a public-nuisance charge and a $1,000 fine paid to a victims’ restitution fund. PBS Frontline reported that Glasser entered the plea; his Wikipedia article says his company did. Because the accounts differ on who was convicted of what, the case is described here rather than listed.

KK
Kimberly Kupps (Theresa Taylor)

A 2011 Polk County, Florida obscenity plea is widely referred to but appears only on adult-webmaster forums and on the posts of the law firm that represented her. No court record, no prosecutor’s statement and no report from an established outlet could be found. Not asserted.

RI
Ryan Idol

Idol performed in gay adult film between 1989 and 1996, took an AVN Hall of Fame induction in 1995 and afterwards built a mainstream stage career that reached Broadway in 2007. A Sacramento attempted-murder conviction arising from a 2009 assault on a former partner is widely reported, but we could not trace it to a court record, a prosecutor’s statement or named contemporaneous reporting from an established outlet, and the sources available to us do not even agree on the year. This page will not assert a criminal conviction against a living person on that footing, and it will not pick a year to make the sentence read cleanly. Removed from the list on 27 August 2026, on the same basis as Ginger Lynn: the limitation is ours, and we would rather publish it than the claim.

Acquittals, dismissals, dropped charges and unresolved cases

Ron Jeremy

Never convicted of anything. A Los Angeles judge found him mentally incompetent to stand trial in January 2023, citing incurable neurocognitive decline, and he was subsequently committed to a state mental health facility. He was charged in 2021 with dozens of counts involving more than twenty women and pleaded not guilty; those charges have never been tried. He is separately excluded from every ranking in this programme under our policy on unresolved multi-accuser allegations.

James Deen

Never charged with a criminal offence. From November 2015 at least nine women, several of them performers, publicly alleged assault; he denied the allegations and no prosecution followed. He is excluded programme-wide under the same unresolved-allegations policy, which covers credible untested allegations rather than only proven ones. There is no conviction and nothing on this page implies one.

John Holmes

Acquitted. Tried in 1982 over the Wonderland murders and found not guilty by a Los Angeles jury on 26 June 1982; the prosecution’s strongest evidence was a palm print. He was subsequently jailed for contempt of court for refusing to testify to a grand jury and served 110 days before relenting in November 1982. He is the name most often wrongly listed as a convicted murderer under this search term. He died in 1988.

John Stagliano

Charges dismissed. His federal obscenity trial in Washington DC collapsed on 16 July 2010 when Judge Richard Leon granted a defence motion at the close of the prosecution case, finding the evidence, in the Washington Post’s account, insufficient to connect the films to the defendants. No conviction was entered against Stagliano or either of his companies.

Stormy Daniels

Charges dropped within hours. She was arrested at a Columbus, Ohio club on 11 July 2018 and charged with three misdemeanour offences; the city attorney dismissed them the same day, saying the statute did not apply. Two officers were later fired over the arrest and the city settled her civil claim for $450,000. She has no conviction, and her role in the far more heavily reported New York proceedings of 2024 was as a witness, not a defendant.

Nacho Vidal

No conviction exists. He was arrested in Spain in 2020 in connection with the 2019 death of a photographer during a ritual involving toad venom. The investigation was provisionally dismissed, the Valencia provincial court revoked that dismissal in March 2024, and subsequent Spanish reporting describes a further provisional dismissal. Whatever the current procedural position, he has not been convicted of anything and does not belong on a list of convictions.

Mercedes Carrera and Jason Whitney

Charged, not convicted. Both were arrested in San Bernardino County, California in February 2019 and a judge found sufficient evidence in August 2019 for the case to proceed to trial on multiple counts. As of our audit date no trial verdict is documented in any source we accept. An untried charge is not a conviction and neither person is on the list above.

Ginger Lynn

Dropped for sourcing, not because the claim is disproved. A 1991 federal conviction for filing a false tax return is stated on her Wikipedia article and repeated on hundreds of pages. We could not trace it to a court record or to any contemporaneous report from an established outlet, so this page does not assert it. That is a limitation of our sourcing, and we would rather publish the limitation than the claim.

Jesse Jane

Arrests, not convictions. Two Oklahoma arrests are documented in local and national coverage — public intoxication in 2018 and a domestic-violence allegation in 2020 — and no conviction from either is documented anywhere we would accept. She died in 2024. Listing an arrest as a conviction is the single most common error made on pages under this keyword.

Traci Lords and Linda Lovelace

Neither was convicted of anything, and both are excluded from every ranking in this programme for reasons unconnected to criminal law — Lords because credits exist that were produced before she turned eighteen, Lovelace because of her own documented statements that she was coerced. In the prosecutions that followed the Lords case, the defendants were distributors; she was the subject of the investigation, not its target.

Background

Which laws actually reach this industry

Four bodies of law have produced criminal cases against people in adult film, and they have almost nothing to do with each other. Knowing which is which is the difference between reading this page correctly and reading it as a list of scandals.

Obscenity, and why it stopped

Federal obscenity law reaches the content of a film, not the conduct behind it, and it is the only charge that has ever been brought against people purely for making legal pornography with consenting adults. The Justice Department ran a dedicated Obscenity Prosecution Task Force from 2005; it produced the Max Hardcore conviction in 2008, the Extreme Associates pleas in 2009 and the Ira Isaacs conviction in 2012. The unit was absorbed into the department’s child exploitation section in 2011 and adult obscenity prosecutions have effectively ceased since. Harry Reems’s 1976 conviction, overturned in 1977, was the first of this kind and the only one ever brought against an actor purely for appearing.

People v. Freeman, and why Los Angeles production is legal

In the late 1980s California prosecuted the producer Harold Freeman for pandering — paying people to have sex — on the theory that hiring performers was procuring prostitution. The California Supreme Court reversed the conviction in 1988, holding the pandering statute was not aimed at film production, and the US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal. Every legal adult production in California since rests on that decision. It is also why the criminal cases on this page overwhelmingly involve conduct outside the workplace: performing itself has not been prosecutable in the state where most of the work happens for nearly forty years.

Trafficking law, and the GirlsDoPorn prosecution

The sex-trafficking statutes reach force, fraud and coercion in obtaining a commercial sex act, and they are what replaced obscenity as the industry’s live criminal exposure. Seven defendants were convicted in the GirlsDoPorn case in the Southern District of California between 2021 and 2026: the owner received twenty-seven years, a second operator fourteen, the performer-recruiter twenty, a cameraman four, an office manager two, and the male performer four. A court also ordered roughly $18 million in restitution and transferred the video rights to the victims. Two of the seven were performers and five were not — a distinction most coverage under this search term loses entirely.

Health testing, and the one criminal case it produced

The American industry’s testing regime is run privately through PASS, and a current clear result is a booking requirement rather than a legal one. It has produced exactly one criminal prosecution on this page: Mr. Marcus tested positive for syphilis in July 2012, altered a copy of the document to hide the result, and continued working. The Los Angeles City Attorney prosecuted, he pleaded no contest, and he was sentenced in June 2013 to thirty days. The case is the strongest argument against the industry’s claim that a private testing system is self-enforcing.

Producers, agents and operators are not performers

The most common factual error under this keyword is treating everyone in the industry as talent. Michael Pratt owned GirlsDoPorn. Rob Zicari co-founded Extreme Associates. Ira Isaacs sold videos from his own websites. The Spanish producer known as Torbe accepted a two-year sentence in 2023 over child sexual abuse material, and the Los Angeles agent Derek Hay pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit pandering and to perjury and served two months. None of them performed. All of them are described as porn stars somewhere on the first page of results for this search.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Which porn stars have been convicted of crimes?

Ten with convictions we can document from court records or prosecutors’ offices: Harry Reems (overturned), Max Hardcore, Lizzy Borden, Ruben Andre Garcia, Douglas Wiederhold, Austin Wolf, Mr. Marcus, Jarec Wentworth, Kendra Sunderland and John Wayne Bobbitt. Their offences range from a $1,000 misdemeanour fine to a twenty-year federal sentence.

Was Ron Jeremy convicted?

No. He was charged in 2021 with dozens of sexual assault counts involving more than twenty women and pleaded not guilty, but in January 2023 a Los Angeles judge found him mentally incompetent to stand trial because of incurable neurocognitive decline, and he was committed to a state mental health facility. The charges have never been tried and there is no conviction.

Was John Holmes convicted of the Wonderland murders?

No. He was acquitted by a Los Angeles jury on 26 June 1982. He was separately jailed for contempt of court after refusing to testify to a grand jury, serving 110 days before he relented in November 1982. Pages that list him as a convicted murderer are wrong, and it is the most repeated error under this search term.

Which porn star got the longest prison sentence?

Of the performers documented here, Ruben Andre Garcia: twenty years, imposed in June 2021 for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion in the GirlsDoPorn case. Austin Wolf received nineteen years in September 2025 for child sexual exploitation. The longest sentence in the GirlsDoPorn case overall — twenty-seven years — went to Michael Pratt, who owned the site and never performed.

Has anyone gone to prison just for making pornography?

In the United States, only under obscenity law, and only a handful of people. Max Hardcore served roughly two and a half years of a 46-month sentence after a 2008 federal conviction; Rob Zicari and Lizzy Borden each served a year and a day after pleading guilty in 2009; Ira Isaacs was sentenced to four years after a 2012 conviction. Harry Reems was convicted in 1976 and had it overturned in 1977. Adult obscenity prosecutions effectively stopped after 2013.

Why is Harry Reems on a page about convictions if his was overturned?

Because the reversal is the point. He was convicted in March 1976 in Memphis and his lawyers argued he was the first American actor prosecuted federally purely for appearing in a film. An appeals court set the conviction aside in April 1977 and the charges were dropped that August. He has no criminal record from the case, and any page listing him as convicted without saying so is publishing a false claim about a dead man.

Was Stormy Daniels convicted of anything?

No. She was arrested at an Ohio club in July 2018 and charged with three misdemeanours; the city attorney dropped them the same day, two officers were later fired over the arrest, and the city settled her civil claim for $450,000. In the New York proceedings of 2024 she appeared as a witness. She has no conviction.

What happened in the GirlsDoPorn case?

Seven defendants were convicted of sex trafficking offences in the Southern District of California between 2021 and 2026 for recruiting young women through fake modelling advertisements and false promises that the videos would never appear online. Sentences ran from two to twenty-seven years, and about $18 million in restitution was ordered. Two of the seven — Ruben Andre Garcia and Douglas Wiederhold — performed in the videos; the other five were operators and staff.

Do adult performers get prosecuted for the sex itself?

Not in California, which is where most American production happens. The state prosecuted a producer for pandering in the late 1980s on the theory that paying performers was procuring prostitution, and the California Supreme Court reversed the conviction in 1988. That decision is the legal basis of the whole industry there. Prosecutions since have concerned obscenity, trafficking, or conduct with no connection to the work.

How is this page different from other lists of convicted porn stars?

It separates convictions from everything else. Acquittals, dismissals, dropped charges and untried cases are excluded from the list entirely and set out in their own section with the status in the first line. Every conviction traces to a court record, a prosecutor’s press release or contemporaneous reporting from an established outlet, and three widely repeated convictions were dropped because they could not be sourced that way.

Does this page show porn star mugshots?

No, and it never will. Every conviction here is documented from a court record, a prosecutor’s release or contemporaneous reporting, but portraits across this site are sourced only from Wikimedia Commons, never from arrest or booking photography. This page covers that search by documenting the convictions themselves rather than publishing the photographs some results promise.

Most read

What everyone else is reading

Recently updated

Methodology · The Pornstar Ranked Performer Index v3.0

How we ranked these performers

A 100-point composite built from six weighted pillars. Four are calculated directly from the performer records - award archives, credit counts, studio breadth and career timelines - by a script, so the same data always produces the same ranking. Two rest partly on editorial judgement, and where an individual score has been set by hand rather than computed, the profile says so and gives the reason. Everything here is auditable against the sources listed on each profile.

Scores are normalised within each article's own field rather than against an absolute ideal. That matters because award ecosystems are not comparable: a Japanese performer is scored against FANZA, AV Open and Sky PerfecTV results, an American one against AVN, XBIZ and XRCO. Ranking them on one absolute scale would be meaningless. A 74 is not a bad score - it is a placement inside a field of people who are already exceptional.

⚖︎

Weights for this category. These weights are unusual because the index is doing an unusual job here. It is not scoring the cases — nothing in our rubric can weigh a $1,000 fine against a twenty-year federal sentence, and we would not publish a page that pretended otherwise. What it scores is the person’s documented professional record in the adult industry, which is the only thing the six pillars can measure. So Body of Work rises to 30% and Longevity to 25%, because credit volume, studio breadth and career length are the parts of that record that are actually documented for this group. Audience Demand falls to 5%: ordering criminal cases by how many people search for them is indefensible, and we would set it to zero if the rubric allowed. Recognition falls to 15% because eight of these ten people have no verified award of any kind — several have award claims circulating that we could not confirm against any ceremony archive and therefore did not record.

The second thing worth knowing before you read is that the convictions here have almost nothing in common with each other. Two are federal obscenity cases about the content of films made with consenting adults, and one of those two was overturned within a year. Two come out of a sex-trafficking prosecution in which the performers were also perpetrators. One arose from a falsified syphilis test. One is a $1,000 fine for a misdemeanour committed in a university library. Several have no connection to the adult industry whatsoever, and where that is true the entry says so.

The third is about the shape of the page. Our build orders every roster by composite score, and we have not overridden it here — but the number beside each name measures a professional record, not a crime. Reading it as a league table of offenders would be a category error, so the page is written to make that hard: the chronological index is the first thing under the ranking, the counterpoint on each entry carries the limits, and the completed sentences are written in the past tense they deserve.

⚠︎

Before you publish this page: Every conviction statement on this page is sourced to a court record, a prosecutor’s press release or named contemporaneous reporting; the biography around it frequently is not. Four records have no documented date of birth at all and a fifth has only a year; seven have no published credit total, which means the Body of Work and Longevity pillars — the two carrying the most weight here — rest partly on imputed values. Check anything marked medium or low confidence before republishing, and do not reproduce the ranked order as a ranking of offences.

Industry Recognition
15%
Computed from records

Awards, nominations and Hall of Fame status.

How it is scored

Calculated by script from the award arrays on each performer record. A Hall of Fame induction is the heaviest single signal, then a Performer of the Year win, then a category win, then any other competitive win, then a nomination at roughly a quarter weight. Lifetime Achievement honours are scored as ordinary wins rather than as Performer of the Year, because Hall of Fame induction already captures career recognition and double-counting it visibly distorted an earlier edition of our all-time list.

Awards are the only independently-audited quality signal this industry produces. They are voted by peers and press, their archives are public, and they are the one input a reader can check without taking our word for anything.

Body of Work
30%
Computed from records

Credit volume, studio breadth and niche-defining titles.

How it is scored

Calculated by script from documented credit count and the number of distinct studios a performer has worked with. Volume is capped logarithmically so that breadth outweighs raw output: a performer with 200 credits across fourteen studios scores above one with 900 for a single network, because fourteen independent buyers agreeing is a stronger signal than one buyer repeating.

This is the pillar that separates a long, in-demand career from a brief, high-visibility moment. Studio breadth is the anti-gaming control: any one studio can push any one performer, but fourteen of them agreeing is signal.

Audience Demand
5%
Blind-scored panel

Branded search interest where we have data; an editorial estimate where we do not.

How it is scored

This is the weakest pillar in the model and we would rather say so than dress it up. Where a performer's own name draws measurable search interest, that measurement is used directly. At present that covers a minority of the performers we have scored. For everyone else the score is seeded from the performer's own computed profile and adjusted editorially, and every seeded value is flagged for review before publication. Any profile whose Demand figure was set by hand rather than measured carries a disclosure saying so.

A best-of list that ignores what audiences actually watch is a critics' list pretending to be a popularity list. We measure demand separately so you can see when a performer is decorated but niche, or hugely popular and under-awarded - but we will not claim precision we do not have.

Craft & Screen Presence
10%
Blind-scored panel

Performance quality, range and screen presence. An editorial judgement.

How it is scored

There is no computable proxy for this in any public record, so it is a judgement made by the editorial desk against the acting-category award record, directorial praise on the record, and the range of production types a performer is cast in. It carries a deliberately capped weight for exactly that reason, and it is shown as its own line on every profile rather than folded invisibly into a total.

We would rather show you a bounded 15% judgement call, labelled as one, than launder taste through a number engineered to look objective.

Longevity & Consistency
25%
Computed from records

Years active, output consistency and successful career restarts.

How it is scored

Calculated by script from documented debut year to the most recent verified release, adjusted for gaps. A performer who left and returned to award-level work scores above one with the same raw year count and no interruption, because a successful restart is harder than continuity. Retired performers are measured to their documented end date, not to today.

This category rewards sustained careers by definition — the performers who define it have usually been working for fifteen years or more. Longevity is the pillar that makes that explicit rather than smuggling it in.

Influence & Crossover
15%
Blind-scored panel

Mainstream reach, business ownership, directing and advocacy.

How it is scored

Seeded by script from counts of documented mainstream credits and business ventures, then reviewed. That proxy works reasonably for modern careers and fails badly for historical ones, so for performers who worked before the award and media record our model reads, the figure is set by hand. Every such case is disclosed on the profile.

Some performers changed what the job is, not just how well it is done. Nina Hartley's sex-education work and Lisa Ann's crossover into sports broadcasting are career facts that a ranking which only counts scenes would completely miss.

The six-step process

1

Define the field

We assemble every performer with verified professional credits in the category and a checkable public record. Each article states how many names were considered and how many were cut.

2

Pull the records

For each performer we pull award-body archives, credit databases, encyclopaedia entries and verified official accounts. Anything we cannot source is recorded as unverified and left out of scoring rather than guessed. Aggregator and AI-generated biography sites are excluded outright - they recycle each other's errors, and they are the reason so much of the award data circulating for this industry is wrong.

3

Compute the record-derived pillars

Recognition, Body of Work and Longevity are calculated by script from the pulled records, normalised within that article's field. No human sets these numbers.

4

Set the judgement pillars

Craft is an editorial score. Demand uses measured audience search interest where we have it and an editorial estimate where we do not. Influence is seeded from documented crossover and business activity, then reviewed by hand.

5

Weight, rank, and sanity-check

Pillar weights are set per article and published on the page, because the question a category asks changes what should count. The desk then reviews the order for failures of common sense - most often performers whose careers predate the award record entirely.

6

Disclose every intervention

Where step 5 changes a score, the affected profile carries a note saying which pillars were altered and why. Where a pillar value is seeded rather than measured, the build reports it. We publish the corrections log rather than editing silently.

✕ Who we exclude, and why

  • Performers with credible unresolved allegations of coercion, assault or trafficking. A ranking is an endorsement of a professional record, and we will not extend one where consent is in question.
  • Anyone whose age at the time of any listed credit cannot be independently verified as 18 or over.
  • Performers who have publicly asked to be left off editorial rankings. Removal requests are honoured without argument and without requiring a reason.
  • Content, imagery or links sourced from leaks, hacks or non-consensual distribution — regardless of how widely circulated it is elsewhere.

△ Where this model is weak

  • Demand is our weakest inputWe have measured audience search interest for only a minority of the performers scored so far. The rest carry editorial estimates. This is the pillar most likely to move as our measurement of audience demand widens.
  • Award archives favour recent, American productionAVN, XBIZ and XRCO are US bodies founded in the 1980s and 1990s. Performers who worked earlier, or outside the United States, are structurally disadvantaged by the Recognition pillar. We correct for it by hand and disclose each correction, which is a fix but not a solution.
  • Craft is a judgement, and judgements varyOne informed desk scoring against the acting-award record is better than asserting an order with no reasoning, but it is still a view. It is capped at 15% and shown separately for that reason.
  • Pre-2000 credit counts are unreliableOlder releases are documented far less consistently than modern ones, which understates the output of long careers. The Longevity pillar partly offsets this; it does not fully correct it.
  • Normalisation means scores are not cross-comparableAn 88 on our Japanese ranking and an 88 on our MILF ranking are not the same achievement. Each score positions a performer within her own field, and comparing across articles is not a use these numbers support.
Transparency

Corrections and update log

Factual corrections are made within 48 hours of verification and logged, dated and described at the foot of the article. Changes to the scoring model itself are logged the same way - when we found that Lifetime Achievement honours were being scored as Performer of the Year wins, we published the fix and the resulting rank changes rather than quietly re-running the build. Cadence: Full re-audit every six months; award pillars updated within 14 days of each major awards ceremony. Next full audit: 2027-02-20.

What changed in this edition

  • First edition. Ten documented convictions, plus three convicted industry figures who were not performers, presented unranked.
  • Sourcing bar raised above the programme standard: court records, prosecutor or police press releases, and named contemporaneous reporting from established outlets only. Aggregators and true-crime sites were not accepted for any conviction claim.
  • No award is recorded on any record created for this page. Several of these people carry widely repeated award credits that could not be checked against a ceremony archive, and the programme rule is to treat an unverified award as false.
  • Ten cases excluded from the list because they are not convictions — acquittals, dismissals, dropped charges and unresolved matters — and set out in a separate section with their status stated first.
  • Three convictions dropped for insufficient sourcing (Ginger Lynn, Kimberly Kupps, Ryan Idol); one name dropped because only arrests, not convictions, are documented (Jesse Jane); and three convicted people dropped because no reliable source establishes any of them as an adult performer (Luka Magnotta, Harlow Cuadra, Joseph Kerekes).
2026-08-27
scope

"Porn stars in prison" (135 kw Semrush topic) evaluated as a possible separate reference page and folded in here instead: the incarcerated population is almost entirely a subset of the names already documented on this page (Ruben Andre Garcia, Douglas Wiederhold and Austin Wolf currently serving; Max Hardcore, Lizzy Borden, Mr. Marcus and John Wayne Bobbitt with completed sentences already stated as such), so a standalone page would restate the same sentencing and release facts under a different heading rather than document a distinct population. Relevant secondary keywords added to this page instead; a standalone "porn stars in prison" page remains unpublished pending that decision. Mugshots remain unpublished here as everywhere on this site — portraits are sourced from Wikimedia Commons only, never from arrest photography.

2026-08-22
edition

First edition. Ten documented convictions ranked on Index v2.1 with weights re-set for a page that is not a merit list, plus three convicted non-performers presented unranked.

2026-08-27
sourcing

Ryan Idol removed from the list and moved to the section of convictions we could not place. The attempted-murder conviction is widely reported but could not be traced to a court record, a prosecutor’s statement or named contemporaneous reporting from an established outlet, and the sources on the record conflicted on the year. No year and no outcome is asserted. To restore him, a Sacramento Superior Court case number or a dated report from an established outlet would be needed.

2026-08-22
exclusion

Ten cases excluded from the list because they are not convictions: Ron Jeremy, James Deen, John Holmes, John Stagliano, Adam Glasser, Stormy Daniels, Nacho Vidal, Mercedes Carrera and Jason Whitney, Ginger Lynn and Jesse Jane. All named in the separated section with their status stated first.

2026-08-22
correction

Luka Magnotta, Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes removed before ranking. All three were convicted, but no reliable source describes any of them as an adult performer, and the contemporaneous reporting calls them models, escorts and producers.

2026-08-22
confidence

No award recorded on any record created for this page. Award claims exist for Max Hardcore, Mr. Marcus and Austin Wolf and none could be verified against a ceremony archive, so the programme rule applies and they are treated as unconfirmed.

Accountability

About this guide

The Pornstar Ranked Editorial Desk

Adult-industry research team

Pornstar Ranked's editorial desk has catalogued adult-film credits, award records and studio filmographies since 2019. Every ranking on this site is built from primary sources — award-body archives, studio release data and performer-verified profiles — and re-audited on a fixed schedule.

  • Cross-references AVN, XBIZ and XRCO award archives
  • Maintains a 4,000+ performer credit database
  • Publishes a public correction log for every ranking

✓ Fact-check pass

Every date, award and credit is matched against at least two independent sources before publication.

✓ Consent & dignity pass

Copy is reviewed to ensure performers are described as professionals. No leaked, non-consensual or unverified private material is referenced or linked.

✓ Legal pass

All listed performers are verified adults with documented professional careers. Pages carry RTA labelling and 18 USC 2257 signposting.

◈

Disclosure. Pornstar Ranked is reader-supported and editorially independent. We do not accept payment for placement on any ranking, and no performer, studio or platform can buy, influence or remove a position. Where we link to a paid platform, the link may be affiliate-tracked — this never affects a rank or a score.