2026-08-22
research
Eight regional and national search terms — assamese pornstar, nepali pornstars, bengali pornstar, bangladeshi pornstar, pakistani pornstar, sri lanka pornstar, bhojpuri pornstar, marathi pornstar — consolidated into one page, because the finding is identical for all eight: no documented adult-film population.
2026-08-22
sourcing
English Wikipedia's national categories, checked directly. Indian pornographic film actresses: zero members. Indian pornographic film actors: zero. Nepalese: zero. Sri Lankan: zero. Pakistani: one (Nadia Ali). Bangladeshi: one (Jazmin Chaudhry, and that entry is a redirect to a section since deleted from "Pornography in Bangladesh", not an article). No English-language source documents an Assamese, Marathi, Bengali, Bhojpuri, Nepalese or Sri Lankan adult performer under any name.
2026-08-22
sourcing
Wikidata cross-checked three ways. Adult-film occupation plus birthplace anywhere in Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan or Sri Lanka: one result in the entire database. Occupation plus ethnic group Assamese, Bengali, Marathi, Bhojpuri, Nepali, Sinhalese or Punjabi: zero across all seven. Occupation plus birthplace in West Bengal, Assam, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh or Jharkhand: zero.
2026-08-22
exclusion
Wikidata contains roughly a dozen South Asian entries and around fifteen further Indian ones combining a South Asian citizenship with a pornographic-actor occupation. Every entry was inspected individually: none carries a reference on its occupation claim, none has an English Wikipedia article, and both groups carry consecutive item numbers indicating a bulk import from an external list rather than independently written biographies. None was used, and nobody behind them is named — the same precedent set on our Korean pornstars page.
2026-08-22
decision
FIRST PASS, since superseded — see the second-pass entries below. Zero performers ranked. The two documented South Asian performers with encyclopaedic sourcing — Nadia Ali and Jazmin Chaudhry — are already defined and ranked on our Muslim pornstars and desi pornstars pages. Neither is redefined or re-ranked here; both are discussed in prose with links to their existing profiles. Publishing a two-name list assembled from two other pages’ rosters would just be the same two entries under a new heading. Article ships as a draft.
2026-08-22
policy
FIRST PASS, partly superseded — the second pass added three ranked performers, a four-person companion roster and two further corrections, all of them public professional careers or names already attached to this keyword elsewhere. The policy itself is unchanged and still governs everybody else. As written at the time: no individual is named on this page beyond those two. Not the unreferenced Wikidata entries, not the eighty-three people whose photographs Sri Lankan police published in November 2010 (Reuters and BBC, November 2010), not any subject of MMS-scandal coverage, and not any mainstream regional actress named on competing lists. Those are private individuals and victims of image-based sexual abuse, and a correction that repeats the name is still a page carrying the name and the keyword.
2026-08-22
correction
Nadia Ali’s Pakistani birthplace, asserted on this site’s Indian pornstars and Punjabi porn star pages until August 2026, is not supported by any source on file. English Wikipedia records only that she was raised in New Jersey by a Pakistani family. Her descent is documented; her birth in Pakistan is not, and this page states it that way.
2026-08-22
scope
Overlap disclosed with our Kolkata porn stars page: that page, also a draft, targets "bengali porn star" among its secondary terms but is scoped to Kolkata and West Bengal. This page treats "bengali pornstar" as a cross-border language label spanning Bangladesh and West Bengal, which the Kolkata page does not cover. Cross-linked, not duplicated.
2026-08-22
structure
A practical takedown section added to the industry block — India’s IT Rules 2021 grievance route and twenty-four-hour removal obligation, the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and the 1930 helpline, Pakistan’s PECA Section 21 and the Digital Rights Foundation helpline, Bangladesh’s Pornography Control Act, and the platform-level StopNCII hashing route. Judged the most useful content that can be published under these search terms.
2026-08-22
structure
Second pass. The page previously ranked nobody, which meant it published a ranked-list schema declaring that nothing was ranked. It now carries three ranked performers and a four-person unranked companion roster, and absorbs the four South Indian language terms — telugu, tamil, kannada and malayalam — each with its own dedicated section, taxonomy entry and FAQ, rather than leaving them to become separate thin pages.
2026-08-22
sourcing
Ranked roster sized against the documented record, not a target. English Wikipedia's Indian film actress and Malayalam cinema actress categories describe exactly five careers as softcore: Silk Smitha, Shakeela, Reshma, Abhilasha and Ramya Sri. Shakeela, Reshma and Abhilasha are the entire ranked roster of our published Kerala page, so taking any of them would have put this hub at 33% overlap against a 20% cap. This page takes the other two and adds Sajini.
2026-08-22
decision
Silk Smitha, Ramya Sri and Sajini ranked. All three are film actresses rather than adult performers, all three carry an explicit job title in our data saying so, and the page defines the censor-certified softcore genre before it ranks anybody. Sajini is ranked at low confidence with her limits published on her own entry: no English Wikipedia article, no Wikidata entity, a commercial film database plus her own televised statements, and a live risk of confusion with Sajini Sacharaiah, a different and entirely mainstream actress.
2026-08-22
correction
Anuradha, Jyothi Lakshmi, Disco Shanti and Jyothi Meena placed in the unranked companion roster, each with an explicit job title of "Film actress and dancer". All four were verified individually against their own English Wikipedia biographies and none contains a softcore credit, an adult credit or a reference to either. Three are living. This resolves a contradiction between two of our own pages and is not to be reopened: ranking any of them as an adult or softcore performer would be a false statement about a real person.
2026-08-22
correction
Kuyili added to the corrections. She appears on the "Malayalam softcore pornography" Wikipedia article’s actress roster, which is the roster nearly every competing list copies, and her own biography documents a mainstream Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam film and television career from 1983 to the present — including the item number in Nayakan (1987) — with no softcore or adult credit in it. She is living and still working, and the correction is published with no photograph. Separately noted: the Wikipedia article titled simply "Kuyili" is about an eighteenth-century military commander, not the actress.
2026-08-22
scope
The exact-match term "malayalam porn stars" is deliberately NOT taken as a secondary keyword here. It belongs to our published Kerala softcore page, which ranks the three actresses whose careers were built inside the Malayalam industry and is the deeper treatment. This hub carries a Malayalam section, a Malayalam FAQ and a Malayalam taxonomy row, and links there rather than competing with a sibling for the same term.
2026-08-22
decision
Nadia Ali and Jazmin Chaudhry are still not ranked here. They are the only two South Asian adult performers English Wikipedia documents and both are already ranked on our desi page, Nadia Ali also on our Muslim page. Adding either would breach the 20% ranked-overlap cap arithmetically at any roster size this page can reach. Both are covered in prose with links to their existing profiles, which answers the Pakistani and Bangladeshi keywords without duplicating a sibling’s ranking.
2026-08-22
scoring
Rubric re-weighted for this field and published in full above. Recognition cut to 8% because no award ecosystem ever covered this genre, Demand to 10% because no branded search data exists for any of the three, and Craft to 12% because where no measured data exists our scorer seeds Craft from Recognition and Influence, so a default weight would count those pillars twice. Longevity and Influence carry 25% each as the only two axes on which these three records genuinely differ. Body of Work is kept at 20% but separates almost nothing here, because only one of the three has a published credit count.